Econazole composition and methods of treatment therewith

ABSTRACT

The invention provides a water-based composition for treating an infection by a dermatophyte fungus comprising econazole or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof. Also provided are methods of treatment utilizing the water-based foam composition, as well as its preparation.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/406,826, filed on Oct. 26, 2010, the content of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to a water-based composition of silicone oil, fatty acid(s), and humectant(s), which can be used to treat fungal diseases, such as tinea pedis, tinea cruris, tinea corporis, cutaneous candidiasis, tinea versicolor, and the like

A foamable composition similar to the vehicle compositions described herein is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,993,830. The composition has been used with subjects having toxic hand eczema. What was not described, and what has now been unexpectedly discovered, is that such compositions can accelerate healing of wounds and control inflammation. This vehicle effectiveness is described herein, and in an application filed concurrently herewith entitled “Composition and Method for Treating Wounds” U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/406,864, filed on Oct. 26, 2010.

Econazole nitrate (EN) is representative of azole antifungals. Econazole nitrate is a topical antifungal agent that is currently indicated for a variety of fungal diseases, including tinea pedis, tinea cruris, tinea corporis, and cutaneous candidiasis, as well as for the treatment of tinea versicolor. Econazole nitrate has shown activity against a variety of dermatophytes and yeasts, including most strains of Epidermophyton floccosum, Microsporum audouinii, M. canis, M. gypseum, Trichophyton mentagrophytes, T. rubrum, T. tonsurans, Candida albicans, and Malassezia furfur. Econazole nitrate is a leading antifungal used topically in the United States, with over 20 years of clinical use and history with an excellent safety profile.

Because the vehicle used in the invention is effective in promoting wound healing, it is believed that the composition further containing econazole will be particularly effective in treating fungal/yeast infections, and promoting the healing of infection-induced or associated injury.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Provided, in one embodiment, is a method of treating an infection by dermatophyte fungus or a candida yeast comprising: periodically applying to the infection over a course of days a water-based formulation (comprising: 0.5 to 5 wt % of an emollient comprising silicone oil, 2 to 10 wt % of fatty acid, humectant(s), emulsifying agent(s), polymer(s), and a pharmaceutically effective amount of an azole antifungal or a physiologically acceptable salt thereof), wherein the formulation is formulated as a cream, lotion, milk or foam-former.

Also provided is a method of treating tinea pedis, tinea cruris, tinea corporis, tinea versicolor or cutaneous candidiasis comprising: periodically applying to the infection over a course of days a water-based formulation (comprising: 0.5 to 5 wt % of an emollient comprising silicone oil, 2 to 10 wt % of fatty acid, humectant(s), emulsifying agent(s), polymer(s), and a pharmaceutically effective amount of an azole or a physiologically acceptable salt thereof), wherein the formulation is formulated as a cream, lotion, milk or foam-former.

Further provided is a composition for treating an infection by dermatophyte fungus or a candida yeast comprising a water-based formulation (comprising: 0.5 to 5 wt % of an emollient comprising silicone oil, 2 to 10 wt % of fatty acid, humectant(s), emulsifying agent(s), polymer(s), and a pharmaceutically effective amount of an azole or a physiologically acceptable salt thereof), wherein the formulation is formulated as a cream, lotion, milk or foam-former.

Additionally provided is a method of reducing the risk of infection from a skin or mucosa piercing procedure comprising: applying to the skin or mucosa to be pierced an effective amount of a water based formulation (comprising: 0.5 to 5 wt % of an emollient comprising silicone oil, 2 to 10 wt % of fatty acid, humectant(s), emulsifying agent(s), polymer(s), and a pharmaceutically effective amount of an azole or a physiologically acceptable salt thereof), wherein the formulation is formulated as a spray, cream, lotion, milk or foam-former; and piercing the skin or mucosa.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The azole antifungals include, for example the imidazole, triazoles and thiazole antifungals. The imidazole antifungals include, for example, Miconazole, Ketoconazole, Clotrimazole, Econazole, Bifonazole, Butoconazole. Fenticonazole, Isoconazole, Oxiconazole, Sertaconazole, Sulconazole and Tioconazole. The triazoles anfungals include, for example, Fluconazole, Itraconazole, Isavuconazole, Ravuconazole, Posaconazole, Voriconazole and Terconazole. The thiazole anfungals include, for example, Abafungin. Many if not most of these antifungals may be conveniently used as acid addition salts or other salt forms. A number of these antifungals share the following structural commonalities: a chiral carbon to which is directly linked an aromatic ring that has one or more electron withdrawing groups (such as 2 such groups, which can for example be fluoro or chloro); and one or more azole groups linked to the chiral carbon by a methylene bridge. The azole groups can be linked to the methylene a ring nitrogen of the azole ring.

Azole antifungal drugs are believed to inhibit the P-450 class enzyme 14α-demethylase; the enzyme that converts lanosterol to ergosterol. Depletion of ergosterol in fungal membranes is believed to disrupt the fungal membrane. It should be recognized that while typically a single azole compound will be used, mixtures can also be used. References in “an azole” encompass mixtures unless the contrary is specifically recited.

In certain embodiments, the formulation of the invention provides a non-irritating composition. Irritation, in certain embodiments, is measured by ISO 10993-10: 2002 Standard, “Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices, Part 10-Tests for Irritation and Sensitization,” pp. 6-10, 21, which testing method is incorporated herein by reference. In particular, for each test site on shaved dorsal skin of an albino rabbit, gauze incorporating 0.5 mL of test material or negative control material is applied. One test and one control site are used on each side of the paravertebral skin. The infused gauzes are covered with tape-backed gauze. The trunk of the rabbit is wrapped in elastic bandage secured by hypoallergenic tape. After a minimum of 24 hours, the coverings are unwrapped. Observations are made at 60 min+2, 24 h+2, 48 h+2 and 72 h+2 post unwrapping. Tissue reactions are rated for gross evidence of erythema and edema.

For a given rabbit, values for each test site and each of the 24 h, 48 h and 72 h measurements are totaled, and divided by six (2 tests sites×3 measurements). Control values were treated in the same way. For all rabbits, these test values were summed, normalized against the summed values for the negative controls, and divided by the number of animals. A negligible, slight, moderate or severe response is categorized based on the Primary Irritation Index:

Response Category Comparative Mean Score Negligible   0 to 0.4 Slight 0.5 to 1.9 Moderate   2 to 4.9 Severe 5 to 8

By “non-irritating” it is meant that compositions according to this embodiment of the invention illicit a Negligible Primary Irritation Index.

The non-irritating quality of these embodiments is surprising in view of the surfactants often found in these embodiments. While not being bound by theory, it is believed that water and appropriate selection of relatively mild surfactants, as illustrated herein, may contribute to the non-irritating quality of the composition.

Irritation, in certain embodiments, is measured by the 21-Day Cumulative Irritation procedure, originally introduced by Lanman et al. (Joint Conference on Cosmetic Sciences, the Toilet Goods Association (now named The Cosmetic, Toiletry and Fragrances Association) Wash. D.C., Apr. 21-23, 1968), that has been successfully employed as a test for comparing the irritation potential of mild to moderately irritating topically applied skin care products. The procedure involves daily consecutive applications of occlusive patches to human skin over a 21-Day period. Each of the patches applied is worn for approximately 24 hours, removed under supervision and the sites scored by a trained evaluator.

The relative cumulative irritation potential of topically applied test articles can be compared to a negative (Johnson's® Baby Oil) and a positive (0.2% v/v sodium lauryl sulfate) control following repetitive daily applications to the skin of normal healthy, adult volunteers. The test articles, in addition to Johnson's® Baby Oil and 0.2% Sodium Lauryl Sulfate (v/v in DI water) are rubbed in to the upper back between the left and right infra-scapular areas and then covered with a blank semi-occlusive patch. Test article application sites are randomized to limit site bias. Products are rubbed in and blank semi-occlusive patches were applied to the same sites every day for twenty-one (21) consecutive days for a total of 21 applications. Each patch is worn for approximately 24 hours, removed under clinical supervision and the test sites evaluated approximately 10 minutes following patch removal. If a dermal reaction of a 3-level or greater occurs with any of the test articles at any point during the study, further patch testing on that subject at the test site involved is terminated and the observed score is assigned to that site for all remaining scheduled test days (i.e., last score observed carried forward). If a test site is discontinued for reasons other than a dermal reaction of a 3-level or greater (due to erosion, scabbing, etc.), an erythema score of 3 and any other alpha character associated with the score is imputed and assigned to that site for all remaining scheduled test days. If a test subject exhibits a significant degree of irritation to the adhesive such that patch reapplication is not feasible, the test subject is discontinued from the study and the scores for this subject were not used in determining the cumulative irritation totals. When warranted, individual sites are discontinued due to tape reaction (i.e., tape dermatitis) and are not used in determining the cumulative irritation totals. Individual test article scores are calculated via summation of the results for each day. Subjects receive 21 rub-in applications of 0.2 mL of the test articles (including controls) to both sides of their back during the course of the study. Total cumulative irritation scores are determined for each test article by summing the daily erythema scores for each subject.

In certain embodiments, the composition of the invention has a “non-greasy feel” when applied. A non-greasy feel is measured in reference to a comparison of the feel of the Example 1 composition (non-greasy standard) of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/016,371, filed Jan. 18, 2008 (US2008/175793), applied to skin at 1 mg/cm², compared to the oil-based product described in the Table at Column 3 of U.S. Pat. No. 5,919,470 (Bradley Pharmaceuticals, Inc., greasy standard), applied in the same amount. Application includes working the composition into the skin. While the feel of compositions of the invention may vary, in making the comparison between the non-greasy standard, the greasy standard, and the prospective non-greasy composition, it will be apparent which category the prospective composition falls within. The non-greasy skin feel may be moist and smooth feeling, but the difference in greasy feel relative to the greasy comparative shall be clear.

In certain embodiments, the composition of the invention has a “non-watery feel” when applied. A non-watery feel is a feel much like that of the Example 1 composition (non-watery standard) of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/016,371, filed Jan. 18, 2008 (US2008/175793), applied to skin at 1 mg/cm². A feel that, in contrast, is noticably more watery, is disqualified.

In certain embodiments, the formulation of the invention provides a non-sensitizing composition. Sensitization, in certain embodiments, is measured by ISO 10993-10: 2002 Standard, “Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices, Part 10-Tests for Irritation and Sensitization,” pp. 6-10, 21, which testing method is incorporated herein by reference. Dermal sensitization testing for topical products places into different categories based on their potential to cause dermal sensitization in guinea pigs and extrapolating the results to humans.

In the Induction Phase, ten test guinea pigs are patched with a composition of the invention and 5 guinea pigs are patched with the negative control article, removed after at least 6 hour exposure. After a 24-hour rest period, each site was observed for erythema and edema. The procedure is repeated 3 times per week for 3 weeks. In the Challenge Phase, following a 2 week rest period, the animals are topically patched again, removed after at least 6 hours of exposure. Dermal patch sites are observed for erythema and edema 24 and 48 hours after patch removal. Each animal is assessed for a sensitization response and test results were based upon incidence and severity of the sensitization reaction.

Certain embodiments involve the treatment of “partial thickness wounds,” which for the purposes of this application are those that involve the epidermis and at least a portion of the dermis. Wound healing is measured in the pig model by International Standards Organization (ISO) Guidelines 10993-1 (2003), 10993-2 (2006), 10993-4 (2002), and/or 10993-6 (2007). This kind of study is conducted to determine the effects compositions of the invention applied topically on wound healing in a split thickness skin graft model in the pig. Domestic Yorkshire crossbred swine undergo a single surgical procedure during which six split thickness skin graft wounds were created using a dermatome on the dorsum, three wounds on either side of the dorsal midline. Each site is treated with one of three treatments, Standard Care Dressing (non-adherent absorbable dressing, Johnson & Johnson), Positive Control 1 (Biafine Ointment), or the Test Article (Properm—Hydrometic Foam). The topical treatments are applied topically to wound sites once daily for 14 days at a dose volume of approximately 4 mg/cm² (approximately 25 mg). Observations for morbidity, mortality, injury, and the availability of food and water are conducted, for example, twice daily. Clinical observations are for example conducted weekly. Body weights are measured and recorded pretest and (for example) weekly. Physical examinations are conducted pretest. Blood samples for clinical pathology evaluations are collected from all animals pretest. Wound sites of all animals are evaluated for healing and photographs were obtained from all animals on Days 1 (evaluation only), 4, 7, 10 and 14. Wound measurements are performed in the wound area for all animals on Days 4, 7, 10, and 14. At study termination, complete necropsy examinations are performed and selected tissues were microscopically examined.

References to the vehicle formulation being effective in wound healing refer to effectiveness in the pig model as outlined in this specification.

In certain embodiments, the formulation of the invention is non-comedogenic where the method of measuring comedogenicity is a modification of that described by Dr. Otto Mills (Mills et al., Archives of Dermatology 118: 903-905, 1982). For example, one of the compositions of Table A (described below) was tested using this model. Testing can be, for example, in a single center, test site randomized study comparing the ability of the composition to induce microcomedone formation relative to a positive (Acetulan™) and a negative (Blank Patch) control. Approximately 0.2 mL of the composition and the positive control are applied to blank semi-occlusive patches (TruMed™ patches containing needle punch absorbent cotton and Alpharma Scantape, Brady Medical, Mesquite, Tex.) and these patches, along with a negative control (blank semi-occlusive patch), are applied to the upper back between the left and right infra-scapular areas. Patch application sites are randomized as to their position on the subjects' backs to eliminate test site bias. Patches are applied three times a week (e.g., every Monday, Wednesday and Friday) for twelve patch applications (i.e., 4 weeks) to the designated test sites. Subjects are instructed to wear the patches continuously for 48 hours following the first and second weekly patch applications and continuously for 72 hours after the third patch application. The sites were scored for the presence of erythema according to an agreed upon scale.

At the final visit, after all patches are removed and the test sites are scored for erythema, follicular biopsies of the sites were collected using a cyanoacrylate follicular biopsy technique. Follicular biopsies are examined under a stereo microscope and the number of microcomedones present on the slides counted. The number of microcomedones present at the treated test sites are compared to that observed for the positive and negative control sites to determine significance. The negative control should significantly less microcomedones than the positive control to a high statistical confidence (e.g., P≦0.05). Where the number of microcomedones at the sites treated with the test composition are not significantly different from the number of microcomedones observed at the negative control sites, the test composition is “non-comedogenic.”

In certain embodiments, the formulation vehicle is effective treating split thickness graft wounds. The “vehicle” will be recognized by those of skill—it is composed of the components of the composition less the azole or azole salt, and any titrant added to form an azole salt.

To treat the wound indications of the invention, an “effective amount” of the composition will be recognized by clinicians but for wounds includes an amount effective to accelerate healing to a degree comparable to Biafine Ointment. In certain embodiments for treating wounds, the effective amount is effective to accelerate healing to a degree superior to Biafine Ointment. To treat the fungal or yeast-infection associated indications of the invention, an “effective amount” of the composition will be recognized by clinicians but includes an amount effective to treat, reduce, alleviate, ameliorate, eliminate or prevent one or more symptoms of the disease sought to be treated or the condition sought to be avoided or treated, or to otherwise produce a clinically recognizable favorable change in the pathology of the disease or condition.

Generally, the formulation of the invention is applied two to three times a day to the affected tissue, in amounts of 1 to 5 mg/cm², or as needed or prescribed. Where used to treat an oozing indication, the treatment site can be dabbed with sterile gauze or the like prior to application.

For certain indications, the foam or gel form may often be selected due to the greater ease in assuring coverage of the affected tissue.

In certain embodiments using the foam form, the foam is a stable foam, meaning that when applied to the skin at one of 1, 2 or 3 mg/cm² and not worked into the skin, the foam remains a stably adherent foam for 30 seconds or more. In some cases, the foam remains a stably adherent foam for 60 seconds or more, 120 seconds or more, 150 seconds or more or 180 seconds or more. Though stable, the foam can be worked into the patient's skin.

In certain embodiments, the composition of the invention is essentially free of C1 to C6 alcohols (but not including polyols, such as glycerin or propylene glycol). In certain embodiments, the composition is essentially free of C1 to C5 alcohols (but not including polyols, such as glycerin or propylene glycol). In certain embodiments, the composition is essentially free of C1 to C4 alcohols (but not including polyols, such as glycerin or propylene glycol). By essentially free it is meant that such alcohols may be present in minor amounts, as may be useful for example for compounding, but are not present in an amount that one of skill in the art of pharmaceutical composition formulating would select to stabilize components of the composition. In these embodiments, the amount of such alcohols is less than about 8 wt %. In certain embodiments, the amount of such alcohols is less than about 5%, or 2%, or 1%, or 0.5%, or 0.25% (wt/wt).

When worked into the skin, the compositions of the invention can have rapid absorption—contributing to their non-greasy and non-watery feels. The compositions can be easy to spread and are cosmetically elegant.

While the compositions can contain active ingredients, such as antimicrobial agents, surprisingly the wound treating efficacy can be obtained without such agents, using only components that are not traditionally regarded as active ingredients. While not being bound by theory, it is believed that this efficacy is due to (a) physically providing a protective artificial barrier on the affected surface; (b) providing moisture to the skin/mucosa and improving its hydration; and (c) effectively controlling the inflammation in the affected area.

The vehicle is formulated with an azole. The azole can be the racemate, or it be enriched in one or the other stereoisomer. Liao et al., Yao Xue Xue Bao 28(1):22-7 (1993), report that the (R)-(−)-econazole has greater antifungal activity. Aboul-Enein et al., Chromatographia 54:200-202 (2001), report that the racemate can be resolved on by chiral chromatography. The current invention can be used with sterio-enriched isomer. Azole can be formulated as the acid addition salt. The nitrate is can be used, as cab any pharmaceutically acceptable salt. Dose concentration in the formulation will typically be about 0.5% w/w to about 1.5% w/w, such as about 1%.

The composition contains fatty acids, which can be substantially or essentially ionized, wherein the salt may be more soluble or suspendable in the aqueous solvent of the composition. The fatty acids are, in certain embodiments, non-greasy, meaning that in the aggregate of the formulation, as formulated in the composition, they are non-greasy.

The fatty acid can, for example, be of any composition found in a natural source, including hydrolysis of esterified fatty acids. Or, the fatty acid component can be hydrogenated to remove substantially all or a portion of any unsaturation. In certain embodiments, the fatty acid component is selected such that 50 mole % or more is C12 or higher, or C14, or C16 or higher. In certain embodiments, the fatty acid component is selected such that 50 mole % or more is C22 or lower, or C20 or lower, or C18 or lower. In certain embodiments, 75 mole % or more of the fatty acid component is from C12 or C14 or C16 to C22 or C20 or C18. In certain embodiments, 80 mole % or more, 85 mole % or more, 90 mole % or more, 95 mole % or more, 97 mole % or more, 98 mole % or more, or 99 mole % or more, meets one of the size parameters of this paragraph.

Useful salts of the fatty acids include the alkali metal salts such as sodium or potassium salts; ammonium salts; salts formed with suitable organic bases, such as amine salts (such as triethyl amine, triethanol amine, or the like) and quaternary ammonium salts; or the like. Bivalent or trivalent salts can be used where they do not adversely affect solubility. As needed, the fatty acid components are provided such that a sufficient amount of constituent ionizable molecules are in ionized (salt) form to provide solubility. Such ionized forms can be prepared by adding a titrant. Recitations of compositions described by their formation by titration include the equivalent compositions formed by pre-formed salts or otherwise.

In certain embodiments, the fatty acid(s) comprise an amount of E or more, F or less, of from E to F of the composition, where E is 2, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, 2.5, 2.6, 2.7, 2.8, 2.9, 3, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6, 3.7, 3.8, 3.9, 4, 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 4.5, 4.6, 4.7, 4.8, 4.9, 5, 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 5.4, 5.5, 5.6, 5.7, 5.8, 5.9 or 6 wt %, and F is 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, 2.5, 2.6, 2.7, 2.8, 2.9, 3, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6, 3.7, 3.8, 3.9, 4, 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 4.5, 4.6, 4.7, 4.8, 4.9, 5, 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 5.4, 5.5, 5.6, 5.7, 5.8, 5.9, 6, 6.1, 6.2, 6.3, 6.4, 6.5, 6.6, 6.7, 6.8, 6.9, 7, 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, 7.6, 7.7, 7.8, 7.9, 8. 8.1, 8.2, 8.3, 8.4, 8.5, 8.6, 8.7, 8.8, 8.9, 9, 9.1, 9.2, 9.3, 9.4, 9.5, 9.6, 9.7, 9.8, 9.9 or 10 wt %. Unless otherwise specified, the composition percentages for the compositions are exclusive of any propellant, such as propane or butane or the like.

An emollient, if present, can be a silicone oil such as polydimethylsiloxane (i.e., dimethicone), petrolatum (natural or synthetic), or the like. In certain embodiments, the emollient(s) are an amount I or more, J or less, or I to J of the composition, where I is 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 1, 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 1.7, 1.8, 1.9, 2, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, 2.5, 2.6, 2.7, 2.8, 2.9, 3, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6, 3.7, 3.8, 3.9 or 4 wt %, and J is 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 1, 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 1.7, 1.8, 1.9, 2, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, 2.5, 2.6, 2.7, 2.8, 2.9, 3, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6, 3.7, 3.8, 3.9, 4, 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 4.5, 4.6, 4.7, 4.8, 4.9 or 5 wt %. In certain embodiments, as among emollients and fatty acids in the composition, the amount of emollient is an amount K or more, L or less, or K to L of the emollients and fatty acids, where K is 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 or 20 wt %, and L is 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 or 25 wt %. Relative amounts of any petrolatum can be selected to minimize comedogenicity. In certain embodiments, silicone oil is a major portion of the emollient component by weight. In certain embodiments, silicone oil is 80, 85, 90, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 99.5% or more of the emollient component (by weight).

The composition will typically include emulsifying agents. Emulsifying agents can be non-ionic detergents, such as polyoxyethylene sorbitan fatty acid esters (such as Tween 80 (polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monolaurate), Polysorbate 20 (polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monooleate)), sorbitol fatty acid esters, octyl)-glucosides, PEGylated lipids and the like. In certain embodiments, the emulsifying agent(s) comprise an amount of M or more, N or less, of from M to N of the composition, where M is 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 2, 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 1.7, 1.8, 1.9 or 2 wt %, and N is 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 1.7, 1.8, 1.9, 2, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, 2.5, 2.6, 2.7, 2.8, 2.9, 3, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6, 3.7, 3.8, 3.9 or 4 wt %. The emulsifying agent(s) can comprise detergents with 2 or more, 3 or more, 4 or more, 5 or more fold difference in CMC. The emulsifying agents can, for example, have a CMC at 21° C. of 2×10⁻⁶M to 10⁻⁴M. In certain embodiments, where there are two or more frothing agents, the predominant (by wt) frothing agent can have the lower CMC vs the next most predominant frothing agent.

Hydrophilic polymer(s) can be present. These can be any non-toxic water soluble polymer(s) that (in the aggregate) stabilize composition and contribute to film formation on the skin. Examples include polyvinyl pyrrolidone, polyethylene glycol, starch, water-soluble derivatives of starch, cellulose, methyl cellulose, hydroxymethylcellulose, other water-soluble derivatives of cellulose, carbomers, or the like. For polyvinyl pyrrolidone, for example, useful average molecular weights include from 8,000 to 63,000, such as about 38,000. For all polymers used in the composition, the size can be sufficient to limit penetration of the horny layer of the skin, if skin penetration is an issue for the given polymer. In certain embodiments, hydrophilic polymer(s) are an amount I or more, J or less, or I to J of the composition.

The composition can also contain a humectant, such as glycerol, propylene glycol, other polyols, polydextrose, lactic acid, or the like. In certain embodiments, humectant(s) are an amount O or more, P or less, or O to P of the composition, where O is 4, 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 4.5, 4.6, 4.7, 4.8, 4.9, 5, 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 5.4, 5.5, 5.6, 5.7, 5.8, 5.9, 6, 6.1, 6.2, 6.3, 6.4, 6.5, 6.6, 6.7, 6.8, 6.9, 7, 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, 7.6, 7.7, 7.8, 7.9 or 8 wt %, and P is 5, 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 5.4, 5.5, 5.6, 5.7, 5.8, 5.9, 6, 6.1, 6.2, 6.3, 6.4, 6.5, 6.6, 6.7, 6.8, 6.9, 7, 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, 7.6, 7.7, 7.8, 7.9, 8, 8.1, 8.2, 8.3, 8.4, 8.5, 8.6, 8.7, 8.8, 8.9, 9, 9.1, 9.2, 9.3, 9.4, 9.5, 9.6, 9.7, 9.8, 9.9, 10, 10.1, 10.2, 10.3, 10.4, 10.5, 10.6, 10.7, 10.8, 10.9, 11, 11.1, 11.2, 11.3, 11.4, 11.5, 11.6, 11.7, 11.8, 11.9 or 12 wt %.

The composition can optionally contain a preservative or preservative system but preferably does not. Examples include Phenonip™ XB (a mixture of preservatives, believed to include phenoxyethanol, methylparaben, ethylparaben, butylparaben, propylparaben and isobutylparaben; from Clariant UK Ltd., Leeds, UK), or a less complex preservative, such as one or two of methylparaben, ethylparaben, butylparaben, propylparaben, isobutylparaben, benzalkonium chloride, imidurea or the like.

The compositions will typically contain titrating agents such as triethylamine, trolamine, NaOH, citrate, phosphates, and the like, with trolamine being preferred. The amount is typically selected to provide a dermatologically or physiologically acceptable pH, such as pH 4-9, or 5-9, or 6-9.

The compositions can be formulated as sprays, creams, lotions, milks, foam-formers, and the like. Where creams or lotions are desired, these consistencies can be obtained by selection of hydrophilic polymers, and the amounts thereof. For example, these can include polymers that have a greater effect on increasing viscosity, in appropriate amounts. Such polymers can include, for example, appropriate carbomers, carbopols, methylcellulose, hydroxyethyl cellulose, hydroxyethylmethyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl cellulose, polyvinyl pyrrolidone, hypromellose, polyethylene glycol, polyethylene oxide, xanthan gum, Arabic gum, pectin, starch, alginate, and the like. Addition of suitable hydrophilic co-polymer permits the formation of different forms that retain the same safety and efficacy properties as the foam-forming formulations but do not require the use of gaseous propellants for their delivery to the treatment area. In such embodiments, it may be that the amounts of polymer are to the high end or greater than those amounts discussed above.

Suitable propellants include, for example, propane, butane, isobutene, other hydrocarbons, hydrofluorocarbons, chlorofluorocarbons (Cl/F/(H)/C), and the like. Dispensing devices include those available from Deutsche Prazision, Lindal Group (Schönberg, Germany), Coster (Milano, Italy) and SeaquistPerfect Dispensing (Cary, Ill.).

The formulation of the invention is, in certain embodiments, a stable emulsion. In others, the formulation provides an emulsion when shaken/agitated prior to use. For certain of the foam embodiments, the formulation should be shaken/agitated prior to use. Applicants have found that two-phase emulsions which are shaken/agitated prior to use provides good distribution of propellant and drug. Certain foam embodiments provide a foam that is relatively stable at 35° C., such as stable for 1 or more minutes, or 2 or more minutes, or 3 or more minutes, a period of time allowing for convenient transfer of the foam from a gloved or naked hand to the tissue to be treated. In certain embodiments, including certain thermally stable embodiments, the foam breaks, i.e., loses its foam texture, on application of the shear used to manually apply the foam to the tissue.

Vehicle formulations of the invention have been found to be remarkably antimicrobial. As such, they can be used prepare skin or mucosa for treatments that are skin or mucosa piercing, such as surgery, IVs, needle biopsies, acupuncture, and the like. Mucosal tissues that are candidates for treatment include, for example, esophageal mucosa, rectal mucosa, anal mucosa, urethral mucosa, vaginal mucosa, external mucosa, oral mucosa, and the like. Furthermore, the antimicrobial nature of the vehicle means that formulations can be prepared which lack preservatives or preservative systems.

For example, forearm areas were treated with vehicle formulation for 5, 10, 20 or 40 minutes, then challenged with ˜10⁵ CFU of Escherichia coli (ATCC #11229) or Staphylococcus aureus aureus MRSA (ATCC #33593). Microbial colonization was inhibited to a statistically significant extent after 10 minutes exposure or more for Staph. aureus MRSA, and after 20 minutes or more for E. coli.

One can test antimicrobial effect in an in vitro time kill method, such as by mixing 0.1 mL challenge bacterial suspension with 9.9 g of test product. After one minute, 1.0 mL of the mix is 9.0 mL of Butterfield's Phosphate Buffer with neutralizers. Serial dilutions into the same buffer are plated onto Tryptic Soy agar plates.

Periodic application of the composition can be used to treat infections by dermatophyte fungus or a candida yeast. Periodic application of the composition can be used to treat tinea pedis (moccasin and/or interdigital), tinea cruris, tinea corporis, tinea versicolor or cutaneous candidiasis. Periodic application of the composition can be used to treat topical infections of Epidermophyton floccosum, Microsporum audouinii, M. canis, M. gypseum, Trichophyton mentagrophytes, T. rubrum, T. tonsurans, Candida albicans, or Malassezia furfur.

In certain embodiments, the compositions used in the methods of the invention lack any antimicrobial compounds other than azole antifungal, where the emollient, fatty acid, humectant and emulsifying agents are present in amounts appropriate to provide skin moisturization, skin barrier repair (fatty acid), and the texture properties desired (spray, cream, and the like). In certain embodiments, the emollient, fatty acid, humectant and emulsifying agents are present in amounts appropriate to provide one or more of non-irritation, non-sensitization or non-comedogenicity. In certain embodiments, the emulsifying agent consists essential of (no other present in amounts beyond minor amounts such as 0.1% by wt used to facilitate making intermediate formulations used in the formulation process) nonionic detergent(s). The nonionic detergents can be those where polyoxyethylene and or sugar moieties provide the hydrophilic portion, and hydrocarbons (e.g., alkanyl or alkenyl) provide the hydrophobic portion.

To formulate 100 g, one can formulate all or a selection of the formulations defined by the combinations of the following options:

TABLE A Component Amt. Options (g) A Stearic acid 2.0-8.0 A PVP 1.0-5.0 B Azole salt 0.5-1.5 A Propylene glycol 4.0-8.0 A Glycerin 1.0-5.0 A Dimethicone 0.5-5.0 A Triethanolamine 2.0-3.0 A Polysorbate 20 1.0-4.0 Water Quantity Sufficient

The above can be formulated by mixing the A components stepwise with water heated to promote mixing and solubilization. The B component is added to the A components at a temperature allowing for the fatty acid to mainly be in a melted configuration. A fine dispersion is obtained by usage of a mixer/homogenizer and temperature is brought down to ambient. The formulations can be tested for active content, foam forming (if appropriate), foam stability (if appropriate), non-wet feel, irritation, non-greasy feel, and the like.

In a preferred embodiment, the azole salt is first mixed with the emulsifying agent, e.g., Polysorbate 20, to create an API slurry phase, which is then added to the remaining ingredients except for the titrating agent, e.g., trolamine. The trolamine is then added and the mixture maintained at the proper temperature (e.g., about 50-55° C.) until visually uniform. The mixture can then be cooled (e.g., about 28-32° C.).

Specific embodiments according the present invention will now be described in the following examples. The examples are illustrative only, and are not intended to limit the remainder of the disclosure in any way.

EXAMPLES Example 1 Wound Care

The vehicle for one of the compositions of Table A was tested in a wound treatment model. This composition is designated Test Article in the text below.

Animal Care

Experimentally naive female Domestic Yorkshire crossbred swine, at least 9 weeks of age at receipt, were used. The animals were originally received from Whiteshire Hamroc, Albion, Ind. Prior to use in the study, the animals were weighed weekly and observed with respect to general health and any signs of disease. Ova and parasite evaluations on stool samples were performed, and all results were negative for animals placed in the study.

The animals were individually housed in runs with raised flooring. This type of housing provided adequate room for exercise for these animals. Fluorescent lighting was provided for approximately 12 hours per day. Temperature and humidity were continuously monitored and recorded. The protocol-designated ranges were 61 to 81° F. and 30 to 70%, respectively. Diet (Certified Lab Diet® #5K99, PMI Nutrition International, Inc.) was offered via limited feedings, except during designated periods. Tap water was available ad libitum via an automatic watering system.

Wounding Procedure

The animals were fasted overnight prior to surgery and treated as specified in Table C. Prior to surgery, the appropriate drugs were administered and general anesthesia was induced. A cuffed endotracheal tube was placed and general anesthesia was maintained with isoflurane delivered in oxygen through a rebreathing system with ventilator assist.

TABLE C Procedure-related Medications and Dose Levels Interval, Dose Level, and Route Medication Surgery (Day 0) Daily Postsurgery Acepromazine 0.1 mg/kg IM — maleate Atropine sulfate 0.05 mg/kg IM — Telazol 5 mg/kg IM — Isoflurane To effect, inhalation — Buprenorphine 0.02 mg/kg IM 0.01 mg/kg IM TID × 3 days Cefazolin 25 mg/kg IV — Ceftiofur 2.2 mg/kg IM  2.2 mg/kg IM SID × 5 days Lactated Ringer's 5 to 6 mL/kg/hour IV — Solution (LRS) IM—Intramuscular IV—Intravenous TID—Three times daily SID—Once daily

All surgical procedures were performed utilizing routine aseptic technique. Following induction of anesthesia, the entire dorsal surface was prepared for surgery with Iodine Scrub, 70% isopropyl alcohol, and Iodine solution.

Following completion of preoperative procedures on Day 0, six 2.5 cm×2.5 cm wound sites Were marked out, three on either side of the dorsal midline caudal to the scapula and 2.5 cm (animal numbers 101 and 102) or 5 cm (animal numbers 103 and 104) from the midline, using sterile skin marker pens. The wounds were separated from each other (approximately 5 cm) to avoid wound to wound contact. To avoid cross-contamination of Test Article treated wounds with wound treated by Positive Control Article (Biafine Ointment, OrthoNeutrogena) [purified water, liquid paraffin, glycol monostearate, stearic acid, propylene glycol, paraffin wax, squalene, avocado oil, trolamine sodium alginate, cetyl palmitate, methylparaben, sorbic acid, propyl paraben and fragrance] and Standard Care (non-adherent absorbable dressing, Johnson & Johnson), the Standard Care wound sites were wounded first, followed by the Positive Control Article wounds and then Test Article. The skin covering the wound site and the dermatome was moistened with sterile saline using sterile gauze immediately prior to each wound to aid the running of the dermatome. Six 2.5 cm×2.5 cm×0.50 mm (length×width×depth) split thickness skin graft wounds were created using the dermatome; three wounds were created on each side of the dorsal midline.

If necessary, a pair of scissors was used to aid in the removal of skin. The portion of the dermatome in contact with the skin was frequently cleaned with chlorhexadine, and then rinsed with sterile saline. The dermatome blade was changed following completion of the wounding in each pig, prior to commencement of wounding the subsequent pig. Following the completion of wounding, a piece of dry sterile gauze was placed on each wound to absorb excess blood. Following removal of the sterile gauze the appropriate treatment was applied to the wound. The Positive Control and Test Article were applied to each designated wound site by spreading evenly with a sterile spatula (dose volume of approximately 4 mg/cm², 25 mg). A piece of non-adherent absorbable dressing (Johnson & Johnson) was placed on each wound. The non-stick dressings on each side of the pig were held in place using a sheet of Bioclusive transparent dressing (Johnson & Johnson). The Bioclusive was carefully placed on the wounds, ensuring that it was not pulled too taught to avoid skin irritation. Care was taken to seal the Bioclusive dressing around the four edges of each non-stick dressing. Following the placement of the Bioclusive dressing, the wounds were dressed with Elastikon® elastic tape (Johnson & Johnson). A Surgilast (Glenwood, Inc., Tenafly, N.J.) equivalent to Surgifix (FRA Production S.p.A., Cisterna D'Asti, Italy) stocking was placed on the body of the animal.

Monitoring was conducted during anesthetic recovery for physiological disturbances including cardiovascular/respiratory depression, hypothermia, and excessive bleeding from the surgical site. The endotracheal tube was removed after the animal regained the swallow reflex. Long-term postoperative monitoring included daily inspection of surgical sites. Medications were administered as presented in Table C.

Wound Administrations

The treatments, Standard Care Dressing (sterile gauze bandage), Positive Control, and Test Article, were administered via topical application to six split thickness skin graft wounds created on the dorsum of the pig. Treatments were administered once daily for 14 days at a dose volume of approximately 4 mg/cm² (approximately 25 mg). Wounds were randomly treated with each of the three treatments in a manner that allowed each animal to receive two sites treated with each treatment.

On each day of the study (Days 1 to 14), Telazol (5 to 6 mg/kg, IM) was administered and anesthesia was maintained with isoflurane delivered in oxygen. The bandages were then removed. For the Standard Care treated wounds, the Surgifix stocking or equivalent and Elastikon® elastic tape were removed. The Bioclusive transparent dressing and non-adherent absorbable dressing was then removed from the wound. The site was carefully cleaned with sterile saline and gauze. Following cleaning, a piece of non-adherent absorbable dressing was placed on each wound. The non-stick dressings on each side of the pig were held in place using a sheet of Bioclusive transparent dressing. The Bioclusive was carefully placed on the wounds, ensuring that it was not pulled too taught to avoid skin irritation. Care was taken to seal the Bioclusive dressing around the four edges of each non-stick dressing. Following the placement of the Bioclusive dressing, the wounds were dressed with Elastikon® elastic tape. A Surgifix stocking or equivalent was placed on the body of the animal.

For the Positive Control treated wounds, the Surgifix stocking or equivalent and Elastikon® elastic tape was removed. The Bioclusive transparent dressing and non-adherent absorbable dressing was then removed from the wound. The site was carefully cleaned with sterile saline and gauze to remove any residual material. Following cleaning, the site was dosed and a piece of non-adherent absorbable dressing was placed on each wound. The non-stick dressings on each side of the pig were held in place using a sheet of Bioclusive transparent dressing. The Bioclusive was carefully placed on the wounds, ensuring that it was not pulled too taught to avoid skin irritation. Care was taken to seal the Bioclusive dressing around the four edges of each non-stick dressing. Following the placement of the Bioclusive dressing, the wounds were dressed with Elastikon® elastic tape. A Surgifix stocking or equivalent was placed on the body of the animal.

For the Test Article treated wounds, the Surgifix stocking or equivalent and Elastikon® elastic tape was removed. The Bioclusive transparent dressing and non-adherent absorbable dressing was then removed from the wound. The site was carefully cleaned with sterile saline and gauze to remove any residual material. Following cleaning, the site was dosed and a piece of non-adherent absorbable dressing was placed on each wound. The non-stick dressings on each side of the pig were held in place using a sheet of Bioclusive transparent dressing. The Bioclusive was carefully placed on the wounds, ensuring that it was not pulled too taught to avoid skin irritation. Care was taken to seal the Bioclusive dressing around the four edges of each non-stick dressing. Following the placement of the Bioclusive dressing, the wounds were dressed with Elastikon® elastic tape. A Surgifix stocking or equivalent was placed on the body of the animal.

Erythema and Edema

The wound and skin around the wound was assessed for the presence of erythema and edema. Assessment of erythema and edema was made after the wound had been gently cleaned, if needed, ensuring no damage was caused. Assessment of erythema and edema was graded on the following 5 point scales, according to Draize (Draize J H, Woodard G, Calvery H O. Methods for the study of irritation and toxicity of substances applied topically to the skin and mucous membranes. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1944; 82:377-390, 1959) 4 point acute dermal irritation scale.

TABLE F Erythema Formation Score Observation 0 No erythema 1 Very slight erythema (barely perceptible) 2 Well-defined erythema 3 Moderate to severe erythema 4 Severe erythema (beet redness) to eschar formation (injuries in depth) Maximum possible score = 4

TABLE G Edema Formation Score Observation 0 No edema 1 Very slight edema (barely perceptible) 2 Slight edema (edges of area well-defined by definite raising) 3 Moderate edema (raised approximately 1 mm) 4 Severe edema (raised more than 1 mm and extending beyond area of exposure) Maximum possible score = 4

Results were:

TABLE J Individual Wound Healing Scores: Erythema Study Standard Care Positive Test Interval Dressing Control 1 Article (Days) Score (n = 8) (n = 8) (n = 8) 1 0—no erythema 8 7 8 1—very slight 0 1 0 2—well defined 0 0 0 4 0—no erythema 6 5 6 1—very slight 2 3 1 2—well defined 0 0 1 7 0—no erythema 4 7 7 1—very slight 4 1 1 2—well defined 0 0 0 10 0—no erythema 5 5 7 1—very slight 3 3 1 2—well defined 0 0 0 14 0—no erythema 4 5 7 1—very slight 4 3 1 2—well defined 0 0 0 No sites were scored greater than 2 and as such the data is not presented in the summary table.

TABLE K Individual Wound Healing Scores: Edema Study Standard Care Positive Test Interval Dressing Control 1 Article (Days) Score (n = 8) (n = 8) (n = 8) 1 0—no edema 8 8 8 1—very slight 0 0 0 4 0—no edema 7 6 5 1—very slight 1 2 3 7 0—no edema 6 8 8 1—very slight 2 0 0 10 0—no edema 8 8 8 1—very slight 0 0 0 14 0—no edema 8 8 8 1—very slight 0 0 0 No sites were scored greater than 1 and as such the data is not presented in the summary table.

Exudate

The wound and skin around the wound was assessed for the presence of exudate. Assessment of exudate was made after the wound had been gently cleaned, if needed, ensuring no damage was caused to the wound in doing so. Assessments were graded according to the following 5 point scale. The results were:

TABLE L Individual Wound Healing Scores: Exudate Study Standard Care Positive Test Interval Dressing Control 1 Article (Days) Score (n = 8) (n = 8) (n = 8) 1 0—none 0 0 0 1—mild 0 1 1 2—moderate 7 7 7 3—severe 1 0 0 4 0—none 0 0 0 1—mild 2 2 2 2—moderate 6 6 5 3—severe 0 0 1 7 0—none 4 7 8 1—mild 4 1 0 2—moderate 0 0 0 3—severe 0 0 0 10 0—none 8 8 8 1—mild 0 0 0 2—moderate 0 0 0 3—severe 0 0 0 14 0—none 8 8 8 1—mild 0 0 0 2—moderate 0 0 0 3—severe 0 0 0 No sites were scored greater than 3 and as such the data is not presented in the summary table.

Wound Size

Digital photographs of the site of surgery were taken on Days 4, 7, 10, and 14 during dressing changes and prior to necropsy. Photographs were taken after dressings had been removed and the wound had been gently cleaned, if needed, ensuring no damage was cause to the wound in doing so. For all photographs, a measurement scale was place in the same plane as the surgical sites. Morphometry was performed in the wound area to document changes in wound size. Morphometry was used to determine advancement of wound edge, reduction in total area/percent closure, and time to complete healing.

On Days 4, 7, 10, and 14, digital photos were taken of each wound and the wound area was measured by tracing the edge of the wound. When the wound was considered to be completely healed, the area measurement was 0. The results were:

TABLE M Average Wound Area (mm²) Time point Treatment Day 4 Day 7 Day 10 Day 14 Standard Care Mean Area 590.1 177.6 115.5 0.0 SD 39.93 232.11 135.17 0.00 Positive Control Mean Area 616.4 44.3 87.7 0.0 SD 45.48 101.97 165.58 0.00 Test Article Mean Area 632.2 18.8 0.0 0.0 SD 57.00 39.00 0.00 0.00

The results of this study demonstrate that application of the Test Article (a cream according to the invention) daily to a split thickness skin graft wound in the pig does not adversely affect wound healing. Application of the Test Article was found to reduce the incidence of localized erythema and reduce the amount of time that exudate was present at the site of injury. When evaluated for time to complete closure of the wound, application of the Test Article was found to accelerate healing. Wounds treated with the test article achieved complete closure by Day 7-10 post injury, whereas wounds treated with the standard of care required 10-14 days. At 7 days, wounds treated with the positive control article appeared to be healing at the same rate as wounds treated with the Test Article. By Day 10, three of these wounds had reopened suggesting that wounds treated with the Test Article had better durability of closure. This effect is mirrored in the evaluation of wound area. Application of the Test Article daily to the wounds was found to substantially reduce the size of the wound over time. Upon microscopic evaluation, a slight decrease was noted in subacute inflammation, the degree of neovascularization, and granulomatous inflammation in the Test Article treated wounds. The results of this study demonstrate that application of the Test Article provides accelerated healing with reduced localized erythema and inflammation.

Example 2 Irritation as Measured by the Method of Lanman et al

The Lanman et al. method of irritation measurement was conducted with a vehicle cream (“Test Cream”). The objective of this study was to compare the relative cumulative irritation potential of topically applied cream to a negative (Johnson's® Baby Oil) and a positive (0.2% v/v Sodium Lauryl Sulfate) control following repetitive daily applications to the skin of normal healthy, adult volunteers. This was a single center, test site randomized, clinical trial designed to evaluate the relative cumulative irritation potential of these test articles. The compositions used were the Test Cream, Johnson's® Baby Oil and 0.2% Sodium Lauryl Sulfate (v/v in DI water). These were rubbed in to the upper back between the left and right infra-scapular areas and then covered with a blank semi-occlusive patch. Application sites were randomized as to their position on the subjects' backs to eliminate test site bias. Products were rubbed in and blank semi-occlusive patches were applied to the same sites every day for twenty-one (21) consecutive days for a total of 21 applications. Each patch was worn for approximately 24 hours, removed under clinical supervision and the test sites evaluated approximately 10 minutes following patch removal. Briefly, under semi-occlusive conditions and for up to 21 days, the data revealed that Test Cream was very well tolerated (non-irritating) and its tolerability was comparable to Johnson's Baby Oil (Negative Control).

Example 3 Sensitization

The ISO 10993-10: 2002 method was used to evaluate the allergenic potential or sensitizing capacity of a vehicle foam formulation (“Test Foam”), by screening of contact allergens in guinea pigs and extrapolating the results to humans. In the Induction Phase, ten test guinea pigs were patched with the Test Foam and 5 guinea pigs were patched with the negative control article, removed after at least 6 hour exposure. After a 24-hour rest period, each site was observed for erythema and edema. The procedure was repeated 3 times per week for 3 weeks. In the Challenge Phase, following a 2 week rest period, the animals were topically patched again, removed after at least 6 hours of exposure. Dermal patch sites were observed for erythema and edema 24 and 48 hours after patch removal. Each animal was assessed for a sensitization response and test results were based upon incidence and severity of the sensitization reaction.

None of the animals showed abnormal clinical signs during the test period. There was no irritation observed on the Test Foam and control animals during the induction phase. The dermal response incidence was 0%. None of the test animals challenged with the Test Foam was observed with a sensitization response at any time point, indicating a 0% incidence. The severity was calculated as 0 at each time point. The incidence of dermal response to repeat patch sensitization testing for the Test Foam was zero in the study demonstrating that the Test Foam does not cause dermal sensitization.

Example 4 Comedogenicity

Using the method for measuring comedogenicity detailed above, a vehicle composition and a negative control produced significantly less microcomedones than a positive control (P=0.003 and P=0.037, respectively) and the number of microcomedones at the sites treated with the composition was not significantly different from the number of microcomedones observed at the negative control sites.

Example 5 Antibacterial Effect (e.g., of Vehicle)

Twenty subjects were evaluated, ten subjects per each of the challenge species. Upon completion of a 7-day product restriction period, a trained technician applied the test formulation to the skin of one randomly assigned forearm. The subjects' other forearms served as untreated controls and received no test formulation. Four sites were delineated on the skin of each forearm and, 10 minutes following the product application procedure, the sites were exposed to the randomly assigned challenge suspension for contact times of 5 minutes, 10 minutes, 20 minutes, and 40 minutes and then sampled. Contaminated sites were not occluded, but subjects were sequestered for the duration of the evaluation.

The 7 days prior to the test portion of the study constituted the pre-test period. During this time, subjects avoided the use of medicated soaps, lotions, deodorants and shampoos, as well as skin contact with solvents, detergents, acids and bases, or any other products known to affect the normal microbial populations of the skin. Subjects were supplied a personal hygiene kit containing non-medicated soap, shampoo, lotion, and rubber gloves to be worn when contact with antimicrobials, solvents, detergents, acids, or bases cannot be avoided. Subjects were instructed to use the contents of this kit exclusively during their participation in the study. Subjects also avoided using UV tanning beds or sunbathing, and swimming or bathing in biocide-treated pools or hot tubs.

Escherichia coli (ATCC #11229) and Staphylococcus aureus aureus MRSA (ATCC #33593) were used to challenge the efficacy of the test formulation.

Approximately 48 hours prior to initiating the study, sterile tubes of Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB) were inoculated from cryogenic stock cultures or lyophilized vials containing E. coli and Staph. aureus MRSA. The microorganism cultures were incubated at 30°±2° C. for approximately 24 hours. Approximately 24 hours prior to initiating the study, the broth cultures were inoculated onto the surface of Tryptic Soy Agar (TSA) and incubated at 30°±2° C. for approximately 24 hours. Immediately prior to initiating the test procedure, suspensions of bacteria were prepared by transferring growth from the cultures on TSA into test tubes containing sterile Phosphate Buffer Solution (PBS). Suspension concentrations of approximately 1.0×10⁹ CFU/mL were prepared, determined on the basis of turbidity. Serial dilutions of the challenge suspension were made in PBS to achieve a final challenge inoculum of approximately 1.0×107 CFU/mL. The final challenge inoculum was assayed for number of organisms at the beginning and at the end of the use period.

The left or right forearm was randomized to treatment with the test formulation, and the remaining forearm served as the untreated control. Following demarcation (see below), the four test sites on the skin of each forearm were assigned randomly and bilaterally to post-treatment sample times. Prior to sampling, the subjects were questioned regarding adherence to the protocol. Subjects were examined physically to ensure no evidence of injury was present on the skin of the forearms. The skin of the forearms was rinsed with 70% isopropyl alcohol (IPA) and allowed to air-dry. A technician selected and marked with an indelible ink marker four test sites on the volar surface of each forearm within a 2 inch by 7 inch area. The sites were spaced uniformly, starting sequentially (one through four) from the elbow moving distally toward the wrist, and the ink was allowed to dry thoroughly before continuing. 1.0 mL of the test formulation was then applied to all four sites on the randomly-assigned forearm and a gloved hand was used to distribute the product evenly over all test sites. Any test formulation that dripped to the underside of the arm was wiped with a paper towel. The test sites on forearms assigned as untreated control were not treated with test formulation.

10 minutes±1 minute following application of test formulation (or following the initial decontamination of the untreated control), the four test sites were exposed to 10 microliter of the challenge suspension of E. coli or Staph. aureus MRSA. Following 40 minute±1 minute exposure, 20 minute±1 minute exposure, 10 minute±1 minute exposure, and 5 minute±1 minute exposures, individual sites were sampled using the Cylinder Sampling Technique and then decontaminated with 70% IPA.

The cylinder sampling technique was performed as follows:

At the designated time, a sterile cylinder with an inside area of 3.46 cm2 was held firmly onto the test site to be sampled. 2.5 mL of sterile Stripping Suspending Fluid with appropriate product neutralizers (SSF++) was instilled into the cylinder, and the skin area inside the cylinder massaged in a circumferential manner for 1 minute with a sterile rubber policeman.

The 2.5 mL of SSF++ was removed with a pipette and transferred to a sterile test tube. A second 2.5 mL aliquot of SSF++ was instilled into the cylinder, and the skin area again massaged for 1 minute with a rubber policeman.

The second 2.5 mL aliquot was pooled in the test tube with the first aliquot.

Subjects were not allowed to leave the laboratory for any reason once the testing began. Additionally, subjects were required to wear protective garments and not touch their clothing, faces, or any other body parts with their forearms during the test period. On completion of testing, subjects were required to perform a I-minute rinse of their forearms with 70% ethanol and an air dry, followed by a supervised 4-minute wash with a 4% chlorhexidine gluconate solution. A topical antibiotic ointment was applied to the forearms following the decontamination procedure.

Duplicate spiral plates or duplicate spread plates were prepared from cylinder samples (10° dilution) on MacConkey Agar (MAC) for Escherichia coli (ATCC #11229) and Hardy Chrom Staph aureus (CHROM) for Staphylococcus aureus aureus MRSA strain (ATCC #33593). These were incubated at 30°±2° C. for approximately 48 hours and at 35°±2° C. for approximately 24 hours, respectively, or until sufficient growth was observed. Colonies were counted and data recorded using the Q-Count plate counting system or equivalent.

Example 6 Tinea

This study is a multi-center, evaluator-blinded, randomized, vehicle controlled, parallel group comparison of Econazole Nitrate Foam 1% (according to Table B) with Econazole Nitrate Cream 1% (Fougera®, Altana Inc.) and the Foam vehicle.

The study enrolls subjects presenting with a clinical diagnosis of tinea pedis (Interdigital and/or Moccasin-type) and a positive KOH finding at the Screening/Baseline visit. Subjects who meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria are randomized (1:1:1) to treatment with Econazole Nitrate Foam 1%, Foam Vehicle, or Econazole Nitrate Cream 1%. Blood is drawn to obtain baseline labs (chemistry, hematology, and urinalysis) and a baseline drug plasma level (selected sites only). The assigned study medication is applied once daily preferably in the mornings for 4 weeks. Given the physical differences in the two “active” dosage forms (foam and cream), particular care is taken to assure the clinical evaluator is “blinded” with respect to the medication type dispensed to the subjects.

At Days 8 and 15, a safety evaluation and clinical grading is performed. Dermatophyte cultures taken at the Baseline visit are reviewed to ensure that subjects are eligible to continue in the study. Subjects with negative Baseline dermatophyte cultures, exclusive of subjects participating in the pharmacokinetic aspect of the trial, are discontinued from the study. If fungal culture results are pending at any visit, the subjects continued treatment until the next visit.

At the end-of-treatment (Day 29) a safety evaluation, clinical grading and repeat KOH test and mycological culture are performed. All subjects are asked to withhold the last morning application of the study medication until after skin scrapings (specimens for KOH and cultures) has been collected. At this visit, all subjects had blood drawn to obtain end-of-treatment (EOT) labs (chemistry, hematology, and urinalysis).

Blood is also drawn from all subjects at selected PK sites to obtain plasma drug levels on Day 29. Prior to this visit, subjects at PK sites are asked to withhold application of the study medication until after the initial blood draw has been taken. Following this initial blood draw, the subject applies the medication to the designated areas on the feet (as per Section 6.2 of the protocol) and the time of application and the surface area of application is estimated. Subjects have blood taken at 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours post-application. Subjects with negative Baseline fungal cultures are discontinued at this visit.

For subjects at the PK sites, body surface area (BSA) is calculated from height and weight measurements using the Mosteller formula: BSA (m2)=square root ((Height, inches×Weight, pounds)/3131). Total surface area (TSA in cm2) treated with the study medication is derived using the following formula: TSA (cm2)=0.07*10,000*BSA (m2). Subjects shoe size is recorded on the Case Report Forms (CRFs) but is not used to calculate total surface area of the feet. The surface area of the treatment area is calculated from the Mosteller formula using the assumption that the surface area of both feet is 7% of the total body surface area.

At the end of study (Day 43), subjects with positive Baseline fungal cultures return for the final visit for clinical evaluations and repeat KOH testing and mycological cultures are performed.

The statistical analysis and study endpoints are detailed in a protocol and included clinical as well as mycology outcome measures. At each visit, adverse reactions including local skin reactions, concurrent procedures, and changes in concomitant medications during the study are recorded.

Subjects who do not participate in any pharmacokinetic portion of a protocol are instructed to treat the entire sole/sides and interdigital area of both feet, independent of what form (Moccasin and/or Interdigital) of tinea pedis the subject had. Subjects are instructed to apply a thin uniform coat of study medication over the entire sole of the foot extending onto the sides of the foot for about 2.5 cm (1 inch) beyond the affected skin. Subjects participating in any pharmacokinetic part of the protocol are instructed to treat both feet by applying a thin uniform coat of the study medication over each foot in its entirety up to the inferior aspect of their ankles once a day (i.e., soles, toes, interdigital spaces and the top surfaces of both feet up to the ankles) independent of the area of disease involvement.

Intent-to-Treat Population: All subjects enrolled in the study that are randomized, and dispensed study medication are considered in the ITT population. Subjects who discontinue prematurely from the study following administration of study medication (e.g., subjects who are found to lack a positive baseline fungal culture) are included in the ITT population. No efficacy analyses are conducted on the ITT population.

Modified Intent-to-Treat (“MITT”) Population: All subjects enrolled in the study who are randomized and dispensed study medication, and who have a positive baseline fungal culture are included in the MITT population, a subset of the ITT population.

Per-Protocol (“PP”) Population: Subjects are included in the PP efficacy analyses if they are dispensed and apply the study medication and meet all of the following conditions:

Positive Baseline KOH evaluation and positive fungal culture;

Week 6, Visit 5, is within protocol-specified windows: Day 43±4 days;

Receive drug as randomized;

Minimum number of doses received is defined as 80% of doses based on start and stop dates of study medication application;

Blinded clinical review finds no significant violations of eligibility criteria including no use of prohibited medications/therapies during the study.

Endpoints can be (e.g., two weeks after end-of-treatment:

Complete cure (negative KOH, negative culture, and no evidence of clinical disease as indicated by scores of 0 for each sign and symptom (erythema, scaling/hyperkeratosis, cracking/fissuring, maceration, vesiculation, and pruritus) at Day 43);

Effective treatment (negative KOH, negative culture, no or mild erythema and/or scaling/hyperkeratosis (score of 0 or 1) with all other signs and symptoms being absent (score=0) at Day 43);

Mycological cure (negative KOH and negative fungal culture at Day 43).

Efficacy Results:

Similar cure rates and safety profiles between the test drug (Econazole Nitrate Foam) and reference product (Econazole Nitrate Cream) suggest that they were comparable and both were significantly better compared to vehicle. Complete cure rates in both active formulation groups were statistically significantly higher than those in the Foam Vehicle group in the MITT and PP populations (p<0.01, Econazole Nitrate Foam vs. Foam Vehicle; p<0.05, Econazole Nitrate Cream vs. Foam Vehicle). Effective treatment and Mycological cure rates with both active formulations were statistically significantly superior (p<0.0001) to those in the Foam Vehicle groups in the MITT and PP populations. Consistent with these findings, changes in signs and symptoms from Baseline to TOC (Day 43) indicate that both econazole formulations were effective in reducing the severity of signs and symptoms of Interdigital TP and Moccasin TP.

Safety Results:

Both Econazole Nitrate Foam 1% and Econazole Nitrate Cream 1% were well tolerated with no reports of serious adverse events and no discontinuations from the study due to adverse events. There were no significant differences in the safety profiles of subjects across the three treatment groups. The number of subjects who experienced adverse events was comparable across each of the three treatment groups. Most of these adverse events were mild or moderate in severity and not related to study medication. Pharmacokinetic analysis of plasma levels of econazole following the last application of study medication demonstrated that the extent of systemic exposure to econazole following Econazole Nitrate Foam 1% was not statistically significantly different from the exposure following Econazole Nitrate Cream 1%.

Publications and references, including but not limited to patents and patent applications, cited in this Specification are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety in the entire portion cited as if each individual publication or reference were specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference herein as being fully set forth. Any patent application to which this application claims priority is also incorporated by reference herein in the manner described above for publications and references.

While this invention has been described with an emphasis upon preferred embodiments, it will be obvious to those of ordinary skill in the art that variations in the preferred devices and methods may be used and that it is intended that the invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described herein. Accordingly, this invention includes all modifications encompassed within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the claims that follow. 

What is claimed is:
 1. An aerosol canister consisting of: 0.5-1.5% by weight econazole nitrate; 6-8% by weight of stearic acid substantially in an ionized form; 0.9-2.9% by weight of povidone; 6-9% by weight of humectants, the humectants being one or both of propylene glycol and glycerol; 0.5%-2.0% by weight of dimethicone; 2-3% by weight triethanolamine; 1-4% by weight polysorbate 20; and water; and one or more propellants; wherein the composition as a pH in the range of 6-9; and wherein the weight % of the above ingredients are provided exclusive of the one or more propellants present in the composition.
 2. The aerosol canister of claim 1 consisting of: 1.0% by weight econazole nitrate; 8.0% by weight of stearic acid; 1.9% by weight of povidone; 5.8% by weight propylene glycol; 1.7% by weight glycerol; 0.95% by weight of dimethicone; 2.6% by weight triethanolamine; 3.7% by weight polysorbate 20; water; and one or more propellants. 